JUS2012 Legal history and comparative law

    • Number of credits
      10
    • Teaching semester
      2025 Autumn
    • Language of instruction
      English
    • Campus
      Lillehammer
    • Required prerequisite knowledge

      No obligatory pre-requirements. However, prior knowledge of the content of the first two years of the Bachelor of law is recommended.

Course content

Legal institutions are embedded in (legal) culture and its change over time. The course will provide insight into different comparative approaches to law and give an overview on the evolution of the two main legal traditions: the civil law and the common law tradition. It will explore and compare various legal systems, such as the English, the US, the German, the Norwegian and the French legal system. The course will also discuss how legal cultures are increasingly influenced by international law. 

Learning Outcome

At the end of the course, the student has achieved the following learning outcomes. 

Knowledge

Students:

  • can distinguish and apply the basic elements of the research methods of comparative law. In particular, they will understand and be able to actively use the so-called “Cultural Legal Model” for legal comparative analysis
  • can reflect on the main differences of the civil law and common law tradition and how it affects legal cultures today
  • have knowledge on some of the main characteristics of the legal systems discussed, such as conflict resolution, norm production, and legal education, idea of justice, legal method, and professionalization
  • can discuss the relationship between legal cultures and international law
  • know how the Norwegian legal culture relates to the civil law and common law tradition and how it is influenced by different legal traditions and historical and societal contexts, and can evaluate and reflect on today’s legal methods and institutions in Norwegian law
Skills

Students:

  • can identify the main structural elements and the subcategories of the legal cultural model
  • can apply the legal cultural model in order to identify similarities and differences in legal cultures, and by doing so compare central features in these legal cultures
  • understand and can apply established legal comparative terminology and methods in English
  • can critically reflect on the legal cultural model in light of other comparative law approaches
  • can use the legal cultural model in combination with other approaches in comparative law,  such as the functional and historical approach to legal comparative research
  • can identify, describe, categorise, explain and discuss both the differences and similarities of institutionalised forms of norm production and conflict resolution as well as the prevailing ideal of justice, legal methods, the degree of and attitude towards professionalization and internationalisation of law and its impacts on the selected cultures
  • can critically evaluate the narratives of different legal traditions
  • can discuss possible challenges and solutions for, but also limits of the harmonization of legal cultures, and interpret, discuss, and develop law reforms in the Norwegian legal system
General competence

Students:  

  • has improved their skills in writing and communication in academic English
  • can communicate to members from other legal cultures
  • can identify and deal with potential challenges when working with legal professionals in an international environment
Teaching and working methods
  • Lectures
  • Seminars
  • Supervisions (veiledning)
  • Written homework assignment
  • Self-study
Required coursework

Submission and passing of an individual assignment are a requirement for admission to the exam.

Assessments
Form of assessmentGrading scaleGroupingDuration of assessmentSupport materialsProportionComment
Written examination with invigilation
ECTS - A-F
Individual
4 Hour(s)
  • Dictionary
100
Professional overlap
NameCreditsDateComment
JUS2007-1 Rettskildelære, sammenlignende rett og rettshistorie
10
JUS2007-2 Western Legal Culture & Comparative History and Theory of Legal Methods
10
Faculty
Inland School of Business and Social Sciences
Department
Department of Law, Philosophy and International studies with history