JUS1010 Theories of international law and human rights contemporary challenges

    • Number of credits
      10
    • Teaching semester
      2025 Autumn
    • Language of instruction
      English
    • Campus
      Lillehammer
    • Required prerequisite knowledge

      No formal requirements.

Course content

International Human Rights Law has been one of the most powerful legal and political instruments of our time. However, they have also faced criticism for their cultural bias imposed by the global north, their perceived irrelevance in the context of inequality, environmental degradation, as well as the challenges posed by armed conflict and other contemporary issues.

The course questions the main assumptions of normative international human rights law to better understand its limitations and possibilities across the world. It explores a diverse range of theoretical and methodological approaches to international law, such as Third World Approaches to International Law, Feminist, Marxist, and Realist scholarship, to examine current human rights-related challenges in public international law, including humanitarian intervention and international human rights law (such as international human rights courts adjudication, poverty, and violence).

The course provides a complementary perspective to standard international human rights law for students from various disciplines (such as law, international studies, philosophy, etc.) who are interested in gaining in-depth understanding of critical legal perspectives on human rights and its institutions, as well as analytical tools for addressing contemporary human rights issues.

Main contents

  • Introduction: International Human Rights Law Today
  • Third World Approaches to International Law and human rights
  • Legal Marxism and human rights
  • Realism and human rights
  • Feminism and human rights
  • Case analysis
    • Responsibility to protect
    • Economic and social rights
    • International Human Rights Courts case-law

 

  • Futures of Human Rights?

Learning Outcome

Upon passing the course, students have achieved the following learning outcomes: 

Knowledge

Students

  • have advanced knowledge of key legal texts concerning human rights
  • have advanced knowledge about the legal theories of international law and their approach to international human rights law
  • have advanced knowledge about the differences and convergences between the different legal theories of international law and the normative theory of international human rights law
  • can recognize and understand human rights dilemmas in their historical, political, and social context
Skills

Students

  • can articulate and defend their viewpoints and positions regarding central problems about international human rights law from normative and critical perspectives
  • can apply their knowledge of international law theories to other (professional and public) debates
  • can independently undertake smaller research projects in which the student identifies new issues of international human rights law and argues from the different theories of international law
  • can write human rights law essays by considering the direct connection between human rights, politics, economy, and history
General competence

Students

  • can identify and engage with primary sources of international human rights law and secondary sources such as theories of international law developed in the course
  • can formulate research questions about human rights in connection with the different methodologies and theories of international law for further exploration
  • can discuss key academic questions regarding politics and institutions of human rights, both orally and in writing, and effectively convey the information to both specialized and general audiences in English
Teaching and working methods
  • Lectures 
  • Seminars 
  • Supervision 
  • A written homework assignment 
  • Self-study 
Required coursework

Approval of a problem statement for the exam essay is a requirement for admission to the exam. 

Form of assessment

Essay based exam: The student develops a problem statement within the overall topic of the course, which will have to be approved by the course administrator. Two weeks before the exam, the student will hand in an essay of maximum 10 pages. The exam is a 30 minutes oral exam, of which the first half will be a conversation based on questions related to the submitted essay. The second half of the exam will based on a randomly selected topic from the course. The essay, the conversation about the essay, and the conversation about the random topic, each weigh one third of the final grade.  

All notes on paper (handwritten or printed) are allowed during the exam, but the student’s ability to perform independently of these prepared materials is given significant weight during the grading. 

The exam is graded from A-F, where E is the lowest passing grade. 

Assessments
Form of assessmentGrading scaleGroupingDuration of assessmentSupport materialsProportionComment
Kombinasjonseksamen
ECTS - A-F
Faculty
Inland School of Business and Social Sciences
Department
Department of Law, Philosophy and International studies with history